Of course, it would be great to see based on the series "Game of Thrones" expensive RPG in the spirit "Witcher" or The Elder Scrolls. But while the fans of the "Songs of Ice and Flame" have to be content with small – for example, by the announcement Reigns: Game of Thrones.
REIGNS – A fairly successful series of entertainment for mobile devices and PC. Its essence is simple. You become a king and must hold power, maintaining a balance of forces between the four factions – the army, the church, the people and the treasury. To do this, you need to constantly choose one of two options for the development of events. The solution enhances the influence of one fraction and weakens the other. If one of the sources of power becomes too frail or, conversely, powerful, the royal lady will lose the crown. In some cases – along with the head.
As you can see, the concept fits well with the entourage "Games of Thrones", where everything, including rulers, dwells like flies. IN Reigns: Game of Thrones We will be offered to put one of the nine popular characters on the iron throne – Sansa, Daenerys, Tyrion and so on. The monarchs will discover new skills – for example, Tyrion will learn how to make a iron bank to make it goodbye to forgive him debts. Familiar faces will also meet among secondary heroes.
After the death of the ruler, the red priestess Melisandra will see another king in the flames of the flame of another – so in the future REIGNS The choice of the next candidate for the throne. New characters will be unlocked gradually.
Reigns: Game of Thrones will become available in Steam, Google Play and App Store in October stores. You can pretend the game now.
August 23, 2018 Cade does not give up without a fight in the new Destiny 2: Forsaken trailer
August 24, 2018 Free distribution made a record holder in Steam from For Honor
Reigns: Game of Thrones
The best comments
And two games from Cyanide Studio, RPG and strategy, but Andrei emphasized that I would like an expensive AAA project. All three games still do not reach the epic to the Mastodonts of the genre (although I personally came in to the RPG).
In the RPG Game https://nodepositbonuscasinos.co.uk/review/slots-amigo/ of Thrones from Cyanide, it was quite a good story of Morse Westford and Aestler Sarvik, who was walking in parallel with the main events of the game. Yes, it almost did not concern the main plot, only partially some points crossed, there were references, references, but the spirit and atmosphere of the world of the seven kingdoms were felt. I don’t know why you rested so that Spinoff can be a meaningless dummy.
For take the universe from the original of the secondary character and twist around it, which is again the original.
The series has a beautiful Bronn, he is a mercenary. Who knows what he lived and to whom he served before the Lannisters? Around this you can come up with the darkness of stories. Or, for example, take the times of Targaryen, tell about them, about Robert Baratheon’s uprising, the same. Options for darkness, most diverse and curious that can be done without any curvature.
Why cite the “Lord of the Rings” as an example, when in the heading itself a rather successful “witcher” is already successful in terms of a completely new story? In RPG, intrigues and unexpected turns, with proper ability, is easy to enter.
So I’m not saying that there was no. Just an interactive telltale kinchik and mediocre (I put it "commendably" at one time, but the game is still extremely cheap) RPG – this fits into the definition of "small".
You look at the characters again. This is not a beautiful stylization-perimitivization, this is a cheap shit.
But while the fans of the "Songs of Ice and Flame" have to be content with small – for example, by the announcement of Reigns: Game of Thrones.
Where did you get out of? The series was so popular before the development of games that the interest around it was constant, and we, while still schoolchildren, read it along with Tolkinovsky work.
The second -rate is you, and now I advise you to google, even before the games he entered the collection of better fantasy, and yes, there are people like that, only people like you, have not dedicated apparently, however, they did the right thing
Tyrion will be able to make lounging the fate, Tyrion is certainly cool, but among the heroes of books, only Snow got from the fibe, something decent.
Sho cheap, then yes. Original reigns, that on mobile phones, that in Steam cost either a bax or two. But why immediately feces? Just the format is really more for mobile phones or for people who do not want to play for something simple for long. And by IP I would like something serious and big.
There are enough intrigues in both the Witcher and in Skyrim. I still remember how I participated in the redistribution of lands in Skyrim, in fact determining which side which city will retire. And then he took part in the assault on these cities and the murder.
The fact of the matter is that the "game of the throne" turns out to be an excellent action-RPG. And many developers have proved that AAA is not a label of "emptyness"
I don’t know why I would like.
Firstly, the game of thrones love for intrigues. In the game, all these intrigues would be like a cart fifth wheel. And the game from Telltale fits best into this format.
Secondly, why? The whole story is told through books and TV shows. Here it remains either to masturbate on the story already told, or invent spinoffs-dummy. We have already seen all this in a bunch of games in the lord of rings, which do not represent any value for the universe.
The bookmark was already over at the time of the creation of the game. What is there Martin will write down still unknown.
Witcher format is not the format of the game of thrones. Geralt was in the book the main character and in the game. There is no protagonist in the throne game. It is necessary to either come up with a new one, and this will again be meaningless Spinoff as a war for Middle -earth, or take a secondary character from the original and twist the universe around him, which again twists the original.
Moreover, the bookmark was not needed before the game of the game at all, which would guarantee the absence of a howl of those who were sewn about “Necanon” and “shuggled”. The witcher before the game was just a Polish second -rate reading, of which we had thousands on the book shelves, so you could do anything with the universe. Even the Sapkovsky game behind the canon does not consider it to everyone, since everyone was remembered by the Witcher by games, and not by books.
